Arsenal rival Chelsea for shock Achraf Hakimi summer transfer
Arsenal’s Chances of Signing Achraf Hakimi
The ever reliable Telegraph have revealed that Chelsea and Arsenal are both in the race to sign the Moroccan, whose club is facing uncertain times.
On the face of it, Serie A title-challenging Inter who’re regularly featuring in the Champions League and have a superb coach in Antonio Conte seems like a nice place to be: why change?
It’s not a decision for Hakimi to make. The Italian club’s owners, Suning Holdings Group, were forced to shut down their Chinese club, Jiangsu FC, just months after the side lifted their Chinese Super League title. Aiming to focus on their retail ventures, concerns are that this could impact Conte’s side.
Suning Holdings Group are eyeing a sale of Inter, but in order to raise funds they could look to cash in on some of their prized assets. Hakimi only joined from Real Madrid last summer for £34m, but is one of their most valuable assets and Premier League sides are keeping a firm interest.
It’s said that Arsenal see Hakimi as a right-back, while Chelsea would play the 22-year-old further forward. Operating as a wing-back at Inter, as he did at times with Borussia Dortmund, his best assets tend to be in advanced areas where elite vision and pin-point wide deliveries are lethal tools. Down that right hand side, he does everything. One of few world class players in his position across Europe.
Can Arsenal reasonably target such a player? Of course, looking at both Chelsea and Arsenal, as painful as it is, any unbiased footballer will favour a Blues side fighting at the right end of the table and looking more assured of a top four berth and Champions League football each season. Chelsea can offer what Arsenal can’t right now.
Financially, the Blues are also way ahead. Backed by a billionaire owner unafraid to break the bank – even for managers with minor experience – they will do so again…and again. Once more, Arsenal boast no such luxuries given their current plight.
Is there another way, though?