Arsenal: Best and worst transfer solutions at each position of need

LEVERKUSEN, GERMANY - JANUARY 26: (BILD ZEITUNG OUT) Jonathan Tah of Bayer 04 Leverkusen controls the ball during the Bundesliga match between Bayer 04 Leverkusen and Fortuna Duesseldorf at BayArena on January 26, 2020 in Leverkusen, Germany. (Photo by TF-Images/Getty Images)
LEVERKUSEN, GERMANY - JANUARY 26: (BILD ZEITUNG OUT) Jonathan Tah of Bayer 04 Leverkusen controls the ball during the Bundesliga match between Bayer 04 Leverkusen and Fortuna Duesseldorf at BayArena on January 26, 2020 in Leverkusen, Germany. (Photo by TF-Images/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
4 of 8
Next
(Photo by Marcio Machado/Eurasia Sport Images/Getty Images)
(Photo by Marcio Machado/Eurasia Sport Images/Getty Images) /

Central Midfield—Worst

As mentioned with the centerbacks, there haven’t been a lot of bad ideas with the central midfield. I’ve been so pleasantly surprised by those in charge, that they’re going after sensible, practical choices. It’s like bad transfer rumors (Chris Smalling notwithstanding) are a thing of the past.

More from Pain in the Arsenal

As such, picking a “worst” of the central midfield was tough, but I have to go with Carlos Soler. Again, I am not opposed to signing Carlos Soler, I am just wary of a guy that costs £30m who doesn’t stand out as a clear solution.

The one thing Soler does consistently well is retaining possession, but we already have Xhaka, who is a seasoned pro that’s been through the gauntlet for that skill. Unless Soler has some other upside that just hasn’t happened yet, I can’t see any justification for spending much more than half of that asking price, solely as a project for the midfield.

That’s the thing, he isn’t a solution. I wouldn’t mind signing him, because I trust Arteta’s judgment, but I hope he wouldn’t be the only incoming midfielder.

On to the best of the attacking midfield.