The positive and negatives of Arsenal using 4-2-3-1 & 4-3-3

Arsenal Sticking With 4-2-3-1 Shape Keeps Players in Their Best Positions

Where there are some doubts over fully investing in the 4-1-4-1/4-3-3 system moving forward over the coming weeks is that Smith Rowe has looked superb out on the left wing. Going with that shape morphs Smith Rowe into something more closely resembling a midfielder, whereas he has flourished as an attacker. Seeing how magnificent he was against Tottenham there is an element of not wanting to alter that too drastically.

4-2-3-1 allows Smith Rowe to keep the width that is softened by Kieran Tierney’s attacking prowess so he can drift infield, as well as leaving Bukayo Saka to stay on the right which is unequivocally his stronger flank.

These are Arsenal’s best players playing in their best positions. With talent like theirs, even if the formation changes might seem slightly subtle, the classic manager stock phrase of ‘playing your best players in their best positions’ rings true.

Keeping this formation also opens the door for Sambi, someone who while not the finished article has been the crystal ball for supporters looking at a glimpse into what the future can hold without Xhaka.

Adding athleticism, neater technical ability and constant positivity in possession, all of the better qualities Sambi brings to the table have sung in his short time in north London. Still with defensive polishing to do, this is no better time to give him an extended spell in the side and see where Arsenal can go without Xhaka as one of a double pivot.

Now Takehiro Tomiyasu has entered the fray there is also no more need for one of the two midfielders to drop into the back three. Thankfully. And in keeping two midfielders as midfielders, those with progressive qualities either from deep or in carrying become more useful.

But, despite the debate, there is no need for Arteta to be completely inflexible. Horses for courses, and all that.

Continued on next page…