Arsenal Vs AC Milan: 5 things we learned – Recovery shoots rise
3. The usual response was different
Milan didn’t scare me. Their painful and evident lack of pace, something that has often undone Arsenal in the past, allied with the shortage of creativity and guile in the midfield, led me, and many others to that conclusion. Nothing that I saw in the second leg changed my mind.
More from Pain in the Arsenal
- 3 standout players from 1-0 victory over Everton
- 3 positives & negatives from Goodison Park victory
- Arsenal vs PSV preview: Prediction, team news & lineups
- 3 talking points from Arsenal’s victory at Goodison Park
- Mikel Arteta provides Gabriel Martinelli injury update after Everton win
However, it wasn’t Milan that made me nervous about this match. It was Arsenal. Such is the detriment of the Gunners’ mental fragilities, defensive shortcomings, and game-mismanagement, I was worried that, somehow, they would find a way to squander the two-goal lead from the first leg. I was especially concerned about what would happen if they conceded the first goal. Would, as they have proven is frighteningly likely in recent weeks, capitulation come? That is what I feared, and perhaps even expected.
But that is not what happened. The ten minutes after Hakan Calhanoglu’s swerving, swinging, dipping, diving long-range effort rippled the far corner of David Ospina’s net were dominated by Arsenal. They pressed high up the pitch, they won almost every loose ball, and scored the all-important equaliser to turn the tables quickly.
That was vital for this team. It was also very different to what had been happening in the past. Manchester City, twice. FK Ostersunds. Brighton and Hove Albion. In the proceeding moments after goals, Arsenal looked extremely vulnerable, and even conceded immediately after in some cases. But here, they took the aggressive approach. The gas pedal was thrust to the floor. It was relieving to see.