Arsenal: 4 positives & negatives of Arthur loan signing

2. Arthur’s Form in Europe Has Been Sub-Par

Flash back to Gremio’s Copa Libertadores title triumph in 2017 and half of the world wanted to sign Arthur. Operating as one of a double pivot, his technical quality shone in a division where the individual qualities of players can truly shine.

His move to Barcelona made him one of the most expensive Brazilian exports of all time.

Struggling to adapt to a new league, it took time before Arthur was able to provide more than ball carrying, progressive distribution and moving the ball closer to the box. As he adjusted he also gradually moved closer to the opposition goal, building up his influence on matches with higher levels of duels won, and adding both goals and assists to his game.

Still not quite hitting the heights on a regular basis, his move to Juventus has seen his performances worsen, primarily as he was moved further away from goal. Boasting fine deep-lying traits and capabilities, creatively there has been little on show with him operating too deep in Juve’s system to make a meaningful impact on matches.

Used more like a holding midfielder, that has accentuated his weaker qualities while diminishing his better traits. Defensively he’s seriously lacking, averaging just 3.10 tackles and interceptions p/90.

Can this be changed?

Continued on next page…