Arsenal: 5 pros and cons of James Maddison £60m transfer

3. Emile Smith Rowe Needs Someone Like James Maddison

The arrival of Martin Odegaard struck fear into some supporters. With just over a month of exceptional performances since entering the side, concerns were raised over bringing in another player for that position would stunt his development and limit his playing time.

Smith Rowe only got better.

Like he does on the pitch, he rode that challenge and elevated his game to a new level. His performances improved every week and whether being fielded out on the left or through the middle, he excelled.

But he is only 20 years old. Arsenal have a magnificent talent on their hands that can’t bear the creative burden all on his own. There is scope for Bukayo Saka to play centrally too, but another body in that area has to be brought in to aid Smith Rowe’s development.

Last season Arsenal were dependent on Saka and Smith Rowe. That’s unacceptable. Yes they’re two outstanding young talents and the future of the club, but to be so reliant on them at this stage of their careers can have a damaging effect.

Smith Rowe is a talent that needs protecting. Nurturing him as a young player is of paramount importance. Furthermore, Maddison’s knowledge of the division and what it’s like to be the up and coming star in that position can only help. Smith Rowe won’t suddenly stop playing as a result. He most certainly should not, either. He’s that good.

However, despite the positive notes, there are some concerns that arise from this potential Maddison deal.